The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUMI TOMIOKA
____________
Appeal 2007-2374
Application 10/038,545
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: October 10, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1 to 12. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We will sustain the rejection.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant has invented a system and method of measuring the
transmission line distance between each of a plurality of subscriber units and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013