The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FRANK DUBNER, CHRISTOPH WECKBECKER,
HERMANN LOTTER, JOACHIM POHLISCH, FRIEDERIKE KAPPKE,
RALF KELLE, PAUL CALDWELL, and LEE F. KALIVODA
__________
Appeal 2007-2375
Application 10/319,843
Technology Center 1700
__________
Decided: September 11, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and ERIC GRIMES,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to an animal
feed composition. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Specification describes “a shaped, in particular granulated
feedstuffs additive containing L-lysine and treated with additives, preferably
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013