Appeal 2007-2450 Application 10/634,871 13. A system board comprising: (a) a connector that includes: (i) a first port situated at an exterior edge of the system board and facing outward from said exterior edge, and (ii) a second port, facing inward to an interior of the system board; and (b) a peripheral device operationally connected to said inward-facing port. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Meng US 6,231,399 B1 May 15, 2001 Claims 3, 4, 8 through 10, 13, 16, and 18 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Meng. We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed May 4, 2006) and to Appellant's Brief (filed March 9, 2006) for the respective arguments. SUMMARY OF DECISION As a consequence of our review, we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claim 4 and affirm the obviousness rejection of claims 3, 8 through 10, 13, 16, and 18 through 22. OPINION The Examiner asserts (Answer 3) that Meng's connector 10 with port 14 facing in the opposite direction to port 16 satisfies all of the limitations of independent claim 13 except for the first port being at an exterior edge of the 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013