1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered
2 today is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte YUTA ICHINOSE and YOSHIHIKO ONISHI
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-2452
16 Application No. 10/421,761
17 Technology Center 3700
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: September 26, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and DAVID B. WALKER,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-9. Claims 10 and 11
32 stand allowable.
33 THE INVENTION
34 The Appellants claim an electromagnetic valve, and disclose that the valve is
35 used, for instance, “to change the pressures of hydraulic operating fluid at
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013