Ex Parte Asada - Page 1




                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                              ______________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                          ____________________                                                
                                        Ex parte KENICHI ASADA                                                
                                              ______________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2458                                                 
                                           Application 10/006,577                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                              
                                              ______________                                                  
                                         Decided: October 23, 2007                                            
                                              ______________                                                  
                Before: JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ROBERT E. NAPPI and KEVIN F.                                      
                TURNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of                       
                claims 1-4, 6-10, 12, and 14.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                   
                We affirm.                                                                                    

                                          STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
                      Appellant discloses a cellular phone and related systems where the                      
                cellular phone can be turned on by a sender even when the power of the                        
                cellular phone was in the off state.  (Specification 1:9-15).                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013