Appeal 2007-2467
Application 09/750,150
antecedent basis. It appears that “the predicted value” refers to the earlier
recitation of “a prediction value.”
We also note a typographical error in the figures. Specifically, the
“Next Value Table” (NVT 124) in FIG. 1 is mislabeled as “NUT 124.”
Being “basically a board of review,” Ex parte Gambogi, 62 USPQ2d
1209, 1211 (B.P.A.I. 2001), however, we leave the question of
indefiniteness of claim 1 and typographical errors in the specification to the
Examiner and Appellants.
V. ORDER
In summary, the rejection of claims 13-26 under § 102(b) is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1-12 under § 102(b) is reversed.
No time for taking any action connected with this appeal may be
extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED IN PART
pgc
KENYON & KENYON LLP
1500 K STREET N.W.
SUITE 700
WASHINGTON DC 20005
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013