The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PREETI G. LAL, RICHARD GRAUL,
APRIL J.A. HAFALIA, NARINDER K. CHAWLA,
MICHAEL B. THORNTON, DANNIEL B. NGUYEN, YAN LU,
AMEENA R. GANDHI, CHANDRA S. ARVIZU,
DEBORAH A. KALLICK, MARIAH R. BAUGHN,
JAYALAXMI RAMKUMAR, CATHERINE M. TRIBOULEY,
ERNESTINE A. LEE, LI DING, NEIL BURFORD,
MONIQUE G. YAO, JUNMING YANG, and
JENNIFER A. GRIFFIN
__________
Appeal 2007-2517
Application 10/311,196
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: June 29, 2007
__________
Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, NANCY J. LINCK, and
RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7, 9,
11, 16, and 17. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013