The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK A. SCHUBERT, JING ZHANG,
GUANGHONG ZHENG, FRANK H. FEDDRIX,
RICHARD A. LANGAN, FRANK B. TUDRON,
GARY R. TUCHOLSKI, ABDELKADER HILMI,
JOHN C. BAILEY, and ANDREW WEBBER
____________
Appeal 2007-2550
Application 10/321,182
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 5, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 the final rejection of claims
38-41 and 87-91. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013