Ex Parte Johansson et al - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                                          
                                            not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                           Ex parte INGEGARD JOHANSSON                                                              
                                                               and                                                                  
                                               CHRISTINE STRANDBERG                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                      Appeal 2007-2552                                                              
                                                   Application 10/276,428                                                           
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                   Decided: July 31, 2007                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                                
                   Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE                                                         
                   Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                           
                   TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                           Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                                           
                   decision rejecting claims 1-20.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                    
                           We AFFIRM.                                                                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013