Appeal 2007-2556 Application 10/274,711 ingredients are used in standard ways to produce standard benefits, the combination is facially obvious.29 HOLDING In view of the strong teachings and suggestions in the prior art to use all of the ingredients in claim 1 in a food supplement, we must uphold the examiner's rejection of claim 1. Since the appellant has not specifically argued the separate patentability of any other claim, we uphold the rejection of claims 2-27 as well. The examiner's rejection of claims 1-27 is— AFFIRMED Donald R. Fraser FRASER CLEMENS MARTIN & MILLER LLC 28366 KENSINGTON LANE PERRYSBURG, OH 43551 29 KSR Int'l, 127 S. Ct. at 1740, 82 USPQ2d at 1395-96, citing Sakraida v. AG Pro, Inc., 425 U.S. 273, 282 (1976); accord Richardson-Vicks Inc. v. Upjohn Co., 122 F.3d 1476, 1484, 44 USPQ2d 1181, 1187 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (obvious to combine compositions treating different symptoms of same disorder). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013