Appeal 2007-2557 Application 10/094,866 Therefore, each individual expansion cell within each segment comprises a continuous strand of material that is interconnected to itself to generally encompasses a radial space within the segment. Interconnection bridges are used to connect each individual expansion cell to another within each segment and to adjacent segments. The continuous strand of material is deformable to allow individual expansion cells to exhibit two configurations, wherein the circumference of the second “expanded” configuration is greater than that of the first configuration. In addition, the claim requires that at least one of the interconnection bridges comprises a plurality of narrowings at certain points in the interconnection bridge to permit the interconnection bridge to have greater flexibility when bending proximate the plurality of narrowings. Ley teaches a stent that “is made up of a series of curvilinear expansion cell elements generally indicated at 12 (see darkened example in FIG. 3 for clarity) having relatively wide end portions 14 joined by relatively narrow center portions 16” (Ley, col. 2, ll. 35-39, emphasis removed). Ley teaches that the cells are arranged longitudinally and in substantially parallel rows (Ley, col. 2, ll. 39-42 and FIG. 1). These expansion cells (e.g., element 12 in Ley’s FIG. 3) are equivalent to Appellant’s individual expansion cells. Ley also teaches support members which can be viewed as equivalent to Appellant’s interconnection bridges. Specifically, Ley teaches [a] plurality of longitudinally extending elongate support members 18 are included, one each being disposed between adjacent rows of cells 12. Also, a plurality of circumferentially extending support members 19, preferably substantially normal to support members 18 are also positioned between the rows of cells 12 to intersect portions of the support members 18 and to 28Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013