Appeal 2007-2559 Application 10/228,798 shield” (id. at col. 5, ll. 25-28). Figure 13 of Vallelunga is reproduced below: Figure 13 depicts a butterfly needle 10, a tube connector 19, and flexible tubing 16 in a two dimensional serpentine arrangement. As discussed above, the term “coil” can be interpreted more broadly than a three-dimensional spiral, and can be interpreted to include the two- dimensional structure depicted in Figure 13. However, claim 1 requires a coiled structure made from a “plurality of helical turns.” We agree with Appellant that Vallelunga does not describe a coil established by a plurality of helical turns, that is, a three-dimensional spiral. In addition, although the Vallelunga device may well be capable of effecting a coiled configuration in the shape of a helix, we do not agree that this is sufficient to anticipate claim 1, which requires a “flexible tube including a plurality of helical turns 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013