The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte MANH-QUYNH CHU, PIERRE-LUC REYNAUD and MARC REYNAUD ____________________ Appeal No. 2007-2566 Application No. 10/243,8731 Technology Center 3700 ____________________ Decided: August 28, 2007 ____________________ Before: TEDDY S. GRON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL and MARK NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1 Application filed September 16, 2002. The application on appeal is said to be a continuation of Application 09/806,234, filed March 28, 2001, now abandoned, which is said to be a 371 of PCT/FR00/02183, filed July 28, 2000. PCT/FR00/02183 is said to claim benefit of French application 99/09900, filed July 30, 1999. The real party-in-interest is said to be Recherches Techniques Dentaires, Saint Egreve, France.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013