Ex Parte 6379190 et al - Page 18

                Appeal 2007-2577                                                                             
                Application 90/006,344                                                                       
                      can be screwed onto said tubular shelter, said sleeve locker                           
                      having an inwardly projecting end shoulder; and                                        
                            a ring-shaped stopper integrally formed on an external                           
                      surface of said first connecting member, said ring-shaped                              
                      stopper having a diameter larger than a distance defined by said                       
                      inwardly-projecting end shoulder, said stopper thereby blocking                        
                      said end shoulder and limiting the amount of axial movement of                         
                      said sleeve locker along said first connecting member and onto                         
                      said tubular shelter, so that said sleeve locker and stopper                           
                      secure said first connecting member to said second connecting                          
                      member.                                                                                
                      The connector uses the open-ended "comprising" transition, which                       
                permits the inclusion of elements not listed in the claim.                                   

                      Scope and content of the art                                                           
                      Claim 9, which                                                                         
                was added during                                                                             
                reexamination, defines                                                                       
                the invention in even                                                                        
                greater detail than                                                                          
                claim 1.  As with                                                                            
                claim 1, it is helpful to                                                                    
                understand the rejection                                                                     
                in terms of a table and                                                                      
                figures.  The first figure                                                                   
                is an annotated version                                                                      
                of Chen's FIG. 3, which                                                                      
                the examiner labeled                                                                         
                "Sketch-2" (right)                                                                           


                                                     18                                                      

Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013