The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FRED MITLITSKY ____________ Appeal 2007-2584 Application 10/248,472 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant appeals the final rejection of claims 1-4 and 13-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We REVERSE. INTRODUCTION Appellant claims a method for filling a hydrogen gas vessel that comprises passing hydrogen gas from a hydrogen gas source to a hydrogenPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013