The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY DAWSON
____________
Appeal 2007-2585
Application 09/917,192
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: August 28, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-14 and 23-33.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A door module for covering a surface cut-out recess in an inside
panel of a vehicle door, the door module comprising:
a substantially rigid portion of long glass fiber reinforced plastic; and
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013