The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte ROLF W. REISGIES ___________ Appeal No. 2007-2589 Application No. 10/643,521 Technology Center 3600 ___________ Decided: September 26, 2007 ___________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD and ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 11-18. Claims 1-10 have been withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner. Claims 11-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows: claims 11-15 and 17 over Ferris (US 3,019,763) in view of Smith (US 4,250,836), and claims 16 and 18 over Ferris in view of Smith and van der Lely (US 6,044,793). Each of the Appellant’s independentPage: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013