Ex Parte Seman et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                       Ex parte DENNIS L. SEMAN, JOHN ALFRED HIRSCHEY,                                       
                          ANDREW L. MILKOWSKI, and MICHAEL BARNEY                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-2598                                                
                                          Application 10/378,330                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                         Decided:  August 15, 2007                                           
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH,                                  
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                         
                Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 32, the only claims                   
                pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.                
                      According to Appellants, the invention is directed to hop beta acid                    
                compositions and methods of inhibiting microbial growth by use of these                      




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013