The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOSEPHUS HUBERTUS CORNELIUS MARIA DEKKERS, JOHANNES MARTINUS DINA GOOSSENS, ROBERT DIRK VAN DE GRAMPEL, THEODORUS LAMBERTUS HOEKS, HENDRIK CORNELUS JACOBUS DE NOOIJER, CORNELIS JOHANNES GERARDUS MARIA VAN PEER, and GARY SMITH ____________ Appeal 2007-2602 Application 10/797,975 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 7, 2007 ____________ Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges. MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1-19, the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013