Appeal 2007-2603 Application 10/958,559 6) Tomka discloses a method of producing a thermoplastically processable starch which is a substantially water free, combination of starch with at least one additive such as a plasticizer (claim 1). In particular, Tomka teaches that the resultant starch may have a water content of less than 1.0% (claim 16). 7) According to Tomka, a high water content, i.e., on the order of 17% or more prevents reasonable extrusion of the starch (col. 2, ll. 6-8). 8) The thermoplastically processable starch can be in the form of granulates, flakes, pills, tablets, powder, or fibers (col. 5, ll. 64-68; claim 10). 9) In accordance with Tomka’s process, native starch is mixed with a plasticizer using an extruder or kneader to form an approximately homogeneous thermoplastic mass (col. 4, ll. 18- 24). 10) According to Tomka, the thermoplastically processable starch is suitable, in particular, as a blending component or formulation aid for addition to thermoplastic or thermosetting polymers (col. 6, ll. 14-18). ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS Appellants concede that Ryan discloses degradable polymer fibers for use in nonwovens, the fibers being comprised of polylactide blended with different types of polymers, such as a destructurized starch composition (Br. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013