UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES ZIECH and MICHAEL CHAMBERLIN
____________
Appeal 2007-2613
Application 10/660,239
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: August 31, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and
HUBERT C. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-12, 14, 18, and
20. The Examiner withdrew the rejections of claims 13 and 19 in the
Answer. They along with claims 15-17, 21, and 22 stand objected to. These
are all the claims in the application.
We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
The claimed subject matter is directed to a suspension for a vehicle.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013