Ex Parte Hamada - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                      Ex parte JAMES S. HAMADA                                               
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2643                                                
                                          Application 10/165,805                                             
                                          Technology Center 3700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 24, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and                                                
                ERIC GRIMES,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                      This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1-6 and 19-28.                       
                The Examiner has indicated that claims 29 and 30, the only remaining                         
                pending claims, are allowable (Answer 5).  We have jurisdiction under 35                     
                U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013