The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ARTHUR E. SCHULZE and WANETA C. TUTTLE
__________
Appeal 2007-2649
Application 10/235,998
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: September 20, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and
ERIC GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method
and apparatus for acquiring electrocardiograms. The Examiner has rejected
the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We
affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Specification discloses “a system and method for acquiring,
processing, and communicating an electrocardiogram using a multi-variable
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013