Ex Parte Knoeppel et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not                      
                                      binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                            Ex parte DAVID W. KNOEPPEL, TIM J. COFFY,                                        
                              HENRY ENRIQUEZ, and STEVEN D. GRAY                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2656                                                
                                          Application 11/133,685                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 27, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                  
                PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                

                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of                 
                claims 2-7, the only claims that remain pending in this application.  We have                
                jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013