The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID W. KNOEPPEL, TIM J. COFFY, HENRY ENRIQUEZ, and STEVEN D. GRAY ____________ Appeal 2007-2656 Application 11/133,685 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: July 27, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-7, the only claims that remain pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013