Ex Parte Tau et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                           
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     


                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                ___________                                                   
                              Ex parte LI-MIN TAU, PAK-WING S. CHUM,                                          
                               SEEMA KARANDE, and CLIVE BOSNYAK                                               
                                                ___________                                                   
                                           Appeal No. 2007-2665                                               
                                        Application No. 11/216,805                                            
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                                ___________                                                   
                                         Decided:  August 30, 2007                                            
                                                ___________                                                   
            Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH,                                     
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                     
            SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                   This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-                
            14.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                          
                   1. A film comprising a first layer, the first layer comprising a first                     
            polymer, the first polymer comprising at least about:                                             
                         (a) 50 weight percent propylene, and                                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013