The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte LI-MIN TAU, PAK-WING S. CHUM,
SEEMA KARANDE, and CLIVE BOSNYAK
___________
Appeal No. 2007-2665
Application No. 11/216,805
Technology Center 1700
___________
Decided: August 30, 2007
___________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-
14. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A film comprising a first layer, the first layer comprising a first
polymer, the first polymer comprising at least about:
(a) 50 weight percent propylene, and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013