The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATTHEW LIPSON
____________
Appeal 2007-2680
Application 10/756,352
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 24, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and
CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 the final rejection of claims
1, 6-22, 25, and 26. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant discloses a method of coating the periphery of an optical
element such that the peripheral coating has a sharply defined border
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013