Ex Parte Suzuki et al - Page 1

                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                           precedent of the Board.                                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                           Ex parte JIN SUZUKI,                                              
                                       DAVID RANDAL HINTON,                                                  
                                         JULIE A. GANNON, and                                                
                                    CONRAD GENE GREMBOWICZ                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2682                                                
                                          Application 10/326,4101                                            
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                           Decided: 10 July 2007                                             
                Before JAMESON LEE, RICHARD TORCZON, and SALLY C.                                            
                MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                A.    Statement of the Case                                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal by an applicant under 35 U.S.C.  134(a)                  
                from a rejection of claims 24, 26, and 34-38 of Application 10/326,410.  We                  
                have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                    
                1      The real party in interest is Caterpillar Inc.                                        

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013