Appeal 2007-2701
Application 10/079,811
independent claims 1, 15, and 16 as being unpatentable over Hollander in
view of Platt. Because we have reversed the Examiner’s rejection of each
independent claim, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of any
dependent claims under appeal. Therefore, we also reverse the Examiner’s
rejection of dependent claims 2, 6-12, and 14 as being unpatentable over
Hollander in view of Platt. Likewise, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection of
dependent claims 3-5 as being unpatentable over Hollander in view of Platt
and Campbell, and we reverse the Examiner’s rejection of dependent claim
13 as being unpatentable over Hollander in view of Platt and Harmon.
DECISION
In summary, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of any
claims under appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1-16 is reversed.
REVERSED
KIS
NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C.
901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD, 11TH FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22203
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013