Appeal 2007-2771 Application 10/418,661 Thus, upon return of this application and prior to issuance of the above-identified application, the Examiner is advised to carefully review the admitted prior art and determine whether the admitted prior art affects the patentability of the claimed subject matter. CONCLUSION In view of the forgoing, we affirm the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 23 through 25 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, reverse the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 3, and 5 through 22 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, and remand the application to the Examiner to consider the admitted prior art referred to at pages 2-4 of the Specification to determine their effect on the claims on appeal. In addition to affirming the examiner's rejection of one or more claims, this decision contains a remand. 37 CFR § 41.50(e) (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004), 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)) provides that [w]henever a decision of the Board includes a remand, that decision shall not be considered final for judicial review. When appropriate, upon conclusion of proceedings on remand before the examiner, the Board may enter an order otherwise making its decision final for judicial review. Regarding any affirmed rejection, 37 CFR § 41.52(a) (1) provides "[a]ppellant may file a single request for rehearing within two months from the date of the original decision of the Board." The effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the proceedings before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited proceedings, the affirmed 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013