Appeal 2007-2810 Application 09/894,501 The issues are whether Hoke shows awarding a bonus round and a “secondary event bonus round game” that adds a secondary bonus round in the form of an “apparent” game of skill, rather that a true game of skill, to a first level game of chance. B. FACTS The record supports the following findings of fact (FF) by a preponderance of the evidence. 1. Hoke shows a slot machine. Should the reels align the player must first shoot a ball in the mouth of a snake to get the payout (p. 4, col. 1, ll. 11-24, the snake can be seen at the top of Fig. 1). 2. Shooting a ball in a snake’s mouth is a game of skill. 3. Hoke (p. 4, col. 1, ll. 47-52) discloses: “Should the operator feel it is necessary to adjust the head 87 to have the open mouth 88 more accurate to the path of the throw of the ball … [adjust the knob].” C. PRINCIPLES OF LAW “A claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference.” Verdegaal Bros. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 827 (1987). 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013