Appeal 2007-2848
Application 10/765,106
12. The putter type golf club of claim 11 wherein said upper edge of
said handle is further defined by a flat upper surface.
13. The putter type golf club of claim 11 wherein said handle extends
at least half of the overall length of the golf club from said club head to said
upper end of said shaft.
14. The putter type golf club of claim 11 wherein the first alignment
line is longer than the second alignment line.
15. The putter type golf club of claim 11 wherein the first alignment
line and second alignment line intersect to form a cross.
Cited References:
Dishner US 4,426,083 Jan. 17, 1984
Takeuchi US 5,058,891 Oct. 22, 1991
Radakovich US 5,152,533 Oct. 6, 1992
Eberle US 5,779,559 Jul. 14, 1998
Bloom US 6,506,128 B1 Jan. 14, 2003
Cacicedo US 6,511,386 B1 Jan. 28, 2003
Ferris US 6,723,001 B2 Apr. 20, 2004
Grounds of Rejection
1. Claims 1-15 stand rejected under to doctrine of obviousness-type
double patenting over claims 1-5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,723,001.
2. Claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over Cacicedo in view of Bloom, Radakovich, and Takeuchi
(Answer 5).
3. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
Cacicedo in view of Bloom, Radakovich, Takeuchi, and further in view of
Eberle or Dishner (Answer 8).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013