Ex Parte Otterson - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2867                                                                             
                Application 10/816,664                                                                       
                                            I.  BACKGROUND                                                   
                      The invention relates to a high pressure washing apparatus for flat                    
                surfaces (Specification 1:11-12).  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                  
                            1. Apparatus for cleaning a surface, comprising:                                 
                                   a wheeled chassis;                                                        
                                   an engine and a high pressure pump mounted to the                         
                      chassis, the pump having an inlet and a high pressure outlet;                          
                                   a rotary valve mounted to the chassis and fluidly                         
                      connected to the high pressure outlet and having at least two wands                    
                      connected to the rotary valve so that rotation of the valve causes the                 
                      wands to rotate; and                                                                   
                                   a nozzle mounted to each wand and oriented so that high                   
                      pressure water is sprayed from the nozzles toward the surface.                         

                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference to show                       
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Poppitz        US 6,012,645        Jan. 11, 2000                                             

                      The Examiner rejects claims 1-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                     
                unpatentable over Poppitz.                                                                   
                                             II.  DISCUSSION                                                 
                      We have considered the issues on appeal in accordance with                             
                Appellant’s groupings of the claims.  In accordance with Appellant’s                         
                groupings, and the disposition of the issues on appeal, we need only consider                
                the issues as they relate to independent claims 1 and 9, and dependent claim                 
                4.                                                                                           


                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013