Ex Parte Hathaway et al - Page 2


                 Appeal 2007-2873                                                                                      
                 Application 09/800,793                                                                                

                        9.  A plastic closure capable of preventing leakage between                                    
                        a closure sealing surface having part line flash or surface                                    
                        mismatch thereon and a gasket, said plastic closure comprising:                                
                               a cap portion;                                                                          
                               an annular sealing surface extending below said cap                                     
                        portion and having part line flash or surface mismatch thereon;                                
                        and                                                                                            
                               at least one annular sealing band extending radially                                    
                        outwardly from said annular sealing surface and through at least                               
                        a portion of said part line flash or surface mismatch, so that said                            
                        at least one sealing band engages the gasket so at [sic, as] to                                
                        prevent leakage between said part line flash or surface                                        
                        mismatch and said gasket.                                                                      

                                                THE REFERENCE                                                          
                 Williams    US 1,842,226  Jan. 19, 1932                                                               

                                                 THE REJECTION                                                         
                        Claims 3-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                      
                 unpatentable over the Appellants’ admitted prior art in view of Williams.1                            

                                                     OPINION                                                           
                        We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                                        

                                                                                                                      
                 1 The Examiner also relies upon US 5,320,236 to Gregory (Ans. 5).  Because                            
                 that reference is not included in the statement of the rejection it is not                            
                 properly before us.  See In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342 n.3, 166 USPQ                                
                 406, 407 n.3 (CCPA 1970).  Accordingly, we do not further address                                     
                 Gregory.                                                                                              

                                                          2                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013