Ex Parte Gallo et al - Page 1



                            This opinion is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                   Ex parte HENKEL CORPORATION                                               
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2907                                                
                                          Application 10/644,791                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: 7 August 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before TORCZON, TIERNEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
                TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      The subject matter of the claims on appeal is flame-retardant molding                  
                compositions.  All of the pending claims have been rejected.  The appellant                  
                (Henkel) seeks review of the rejections.  We affirm.                                         

                                               THE CLAIMS                                                    
                      Claims 1-15 and 25-27 are currently pending.1  Henkel has not argued                   
                the separate patentability of any subgroups of the claims as provided by rule                

                                                                                                            
                1 Appeal Brief (20 April 2007) (Br.) 2.                                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013