The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte ROMAN GR. MAEV, FRANK J. EWASYSHYN, SERGUEI A. TITOV, JOHN M. PAILLE, ELENA YU MAEVA, ALEXEY A. DENISOV, and FEDAR M. SEVIARYN ________________ Appeal 2007-2911 Application 10/454,350 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: September 20, 2007 ________________ Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claim 15, which is the only claim pending in this application (claims 1-14 have been cancelled in anPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013