Ex Parte Maev et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                        ________________                                           
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                        ________________                                           
                      Ex parte ROMAN GR. MAEV, FRANK J. EWASYSHYN,                                 
                              SERGUEI A. TITOV, JOHN M. PAILLE,                                    
                           ELENA YU MAEVA, ALEXEY A. DENISOV,                                      
                                    and FEDAR M. SEVIARYN                                          
                                        ________________                                           
                                         Appeal 2007-2911                                          
                                      Application 10/454,350                                       
                                     Technology Center 1700                                        
                                        ________________                                           
                                   Decided:  September 20, 2007                                    
                                        ________________                                           
              Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and                                        
              LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                  

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                 
              Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claim 15, which is the only claim              
              pending in this application (claims 1-14 have been cancelled in an                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013