Ex Parte Kawato - Page 4

                Appeal 2007-2995                                                                                   
                Application 10/998,567                                                                             

                       37 C.F.R. § 41.41 (2006) provides in pertinent part (emphasis added):                       
                              . . . .                                                                              

                              (a)(2) A reply brief shall not include any new or non-                               
                              admitted amendment, or any new or non-admitted                                       
                              affidavit or other evidence. See § 1.116 of this title for                           
                              amendments, affidavits or other evidence filed after final                           
                              action but before or on the same date of filing an appeal                            
                              and § 41.33 for amendments, affidavits or other evidence                             
                              filed after the date of filing the appeal.                                           
                              (b) A reply brief that is not in compliance with paragraph                           
                              (a) of this section will not be considered. Appellant will                           
                              be notified if a reply brief is not in compliance with                               
                              paragraph (a) of this section.                                                       
                       We have thus not considered the present Reply Brief, and will not                           
                consider it in the event that the proceeding returns to the Board.                                 

                       This application, by virtue of its “special” status, requires an                            
                immediate action.  See MPEP § 708.01.  It is important that the Board be                           
                informed promptly of any action affecting the appeal in this case.                                 

                                                  REMANDED                                                         




                pgc                                                                                                

                WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP                                                          
                1250 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NW                                                                        
                SUITE 700                                                                                          
                WASHINGTON DC 20036                                                                                

                                                        4                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4

Last modified: September 9, 2013