The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JASON C. SHERMER
AND MATTHEW J. HOLLAND
____________
Appeal 2007-3147
Application 10/072,435
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 14, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A WALTZ, and PETER F.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-11 and 13-23, which are the
only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
According to Appellants, the invention is directed a universal abrasive
sheet comprising a sheet material having an abrasive material disposed on a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013