Ex Parte Daigger et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte DANIEL J. DAIGGER, RODNEY K. MOORE,                                       
                                        and MARLOW G. CLARK                                                 
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-3148                                                
                                          Application 10/638,885                                            
                                         Technology Center 3600                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                      Decided:  September 26, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                  
               Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                
               LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 the final rejection of claims                 
               1-9.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                     
                      We AFFIRM-IN-PART and REMAND.                                                         

                                               INTRODUCTION                                                 
                      Appellants claim a form assembly for use with a rough-in floor drain                  
               line (claim 1).  The form assembly includes a molded plasticized form                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013