The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LUCIEN ALFRED COUVILLON JR and MICHAEL S. BANIK
____________
Appeal 2007-3154
Application 10/262,817
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: September 5, 2007
____________
Before ERIC GRIMES, LORA M. GREEN, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-25 and 32.1 We have jurisdiction
1 The Examiner withdrew the rejection of claims 26-31 over the prior art,
stating that the claims were patentable over the prior art of record (Answer
3). We note, in addition, that claims 20 and 23 do not appear to be subject to
any rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013