Appeal 2007-3261 Application 09/854,802 Written description rejection The Examiner contends that the claims do not comply with the written description requirement. First, the Examiner asserts that since 95% of the melatonin was released “within the 5th hour” and not “within five hours” the Specification does not describe the limitation in claim 16 that “wherein 95% of the melatonin is released within 5 hours” (Answer 6). The same assertion is made for the limitation wherein 95% of the melatonin is released within 10 minutes. Secondly, the Examiner asserts that the Appellant has amended the claims to indicate that the fast release cortex also contains a lubricant, volume excipient and glidant. However, the Specification does not appear to indicate that the “cortex” contains lubricant or a glidant. The only example set forth contains, in addition to melatonin and HPMC, lactose, a bulking agent, i.e. volume, titanium bioxide, a pigment, and ethyl alcohol and water, solvents, which presumably are evaporated away in order to form the cortex (See Pg. 8, lines 15-23). (Answer 6.) We find that the Specification adequately describes the claim limitations “wherein 95% of the melatonin is released within 5 hours” and “wherein at least 95% of the melatonin is released within 10 minutes.” The Specification expressly describes the release of melatonin within the recited times (Spec. 4: 1-7; 5: 29-32; 12: 1-5). In addition, as argued by Appellants, “[t]he specification is addressed to one of ordinary skill in the art of controlled release pharmaceuticals and it is well known that all measurements of controlled released products are based on a cumulative 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013