The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RUSSELL POINTON ____________ Appeal 2007-3304 Application 10/488,775 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: August 21, 2007 ____________ Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 9. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). The claims read as follows: 1. A display device including, a planar element having a face adapted to carry for display purposes an image or images, the planar element being formed of a flexible or resilient material and being secured to or being adapted to be connected to a securing means by which the device is adaptedPage: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013