Ex Parte Joly et al - Page 1

                            This opinion is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                     Ex parte AGFA HEALTHCARE                                                
                                             Appeal 2007-3363                                                
                                          Application 10/342,711                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                         Decided: August 24, 2007                                            
                Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                             
                RICHARD TORCZON and JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent                                    
                TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      The subject matter of the claims on appeal relates to binderless                       
                storage phosphor screens.  All pending claims have been rejected.  The                       
                appellant (Agfa) seeks review of the rejection.  We affirm.                                  

                                               THE CLAIMS                                                    
                Claims 1-4 and 21-24 are pending.  Agfa has not provided separate                            
                arguments for the claims so we treat the claims as standing or falling                       
                together.  37 C.F.R.  41.37(c)(1)(vii).  The two independent claims are                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013