Appeal 2007-3382
Application 10/040,288
OBVIOUSNESS
Since Appellant has set forth no separate arguments for patentability
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) for independent claim 31 and dependent claims 4,
8-11, 13-15, 19, 23-26, and 28-30, we will sustain the rejection under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
CONCLUSION
To summarize, we have sustained the rejection of claims 1-3, 5-7, 12,
16-18, 20-22, and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102, and we have sustained the
rejection of claims 4, 8-11, 13-15, 19, 23-26, and 28-31 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
rwk
LARSON NEWMAN
ABEL POLANSKY & WHITE, LLP
5914 WEST COURTYARD DRIVE
SUITE 200
AUSTIN, TX 78730
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013