Ex Parte Vogt et al - Page 1

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                         Ex parte KIRKLAND W. VOGT, JASON L. KREIDER,                                        
                                         and ROBERT J. GOULET                                                
                                             Appeal 2007-3387                                                
                                          Application 10/307,027                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                       Decided:  September 24, 2007                                          
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK,                                                      
                and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                         
                Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, 5, 7 through 9, and 11.                      
                Claims 6 and 12, the other claims pending in the above-identified                            
                application, stand withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-                  
                elected invention.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6.                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013