The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALAN THORPE and WALLACE H. KUNERTH ____________ Appeal 2007-3418 Application 11/032,390 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 29, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 24 through 30. The remaining claims pending in this application are claims 1-23, which stand withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non-elected invention (Br. 2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013