Ex Parte Thorpe et al - Page 1

                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                          
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                          Ex parte ALAN THORPE                                                 
                                         WALLACE H. KUNERTH                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-3418                                                 
                                           Application 11/032,390                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                          Decided: August 29, 2007                                             
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                  
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                           
                Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 24 through 30.  The remaining                     
                claims pending in this application are claims 1-23, which stand withdrawn                      
                from consideration as directed to a non-elected invention (Br. 2).  We have                    
                jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013