The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte PAUL A. WERTHMAN, GARY E. SCHRADER,
PETER A. WALTZ, ALAN BECK
and MICHAEL RZASA
__________________
Appeal 2007-3462
Application 11/172,2231
Technology Center 2800
________________
Decided: August 23, 2007
________________
Before RICHARD TORCZON, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and SALLY C.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Statement of the Case
2 Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
3 claims 1-5, 7-9, 12-15, 17 and 19-21. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
4 § 6(b).
1 Application for patent filed 29 June 2005. The real party in interest is
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013