The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EARL O. BERGERSEN
____________
Appeal 2007-3494
Application 10/348,719
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: September 18, 2007
____________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and
NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1-7. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Claims 8-20 are indicated by the
Examiner to contain allowable subject matter. (Answer 2.) Claims 21-23
have been withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as directed to a
non-elected invention. (Id.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013