The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ENNO J. VROLIJK
and DERK VEGTER
______________
Appeal 2007-3496
Application 10/344,472
Technology Center 3700
_______________
Decided: August 28, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting for at least the second time claims 1, 2, 11, 14, 18,
and 20 through 26 in the Office Action mailed March 21, 2006.
35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).
We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013