The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte RISTO OLAVI HARJULA,
JOHANNA TERESIA MOLLER, SUHEEL AMIN, ALAN DYER,
MARTYN PILLINGER, JONATHAN ANDREW NEWTON,
ESKO HEIKKI TUSA, and MAURICE WEBB
______________
Appeal 2007-3543
Application 10/675,138
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 11, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 2 through 4, 7, 9, 10, 17, 18, and 20
through 22 in the Office Action mailed January 25, 2006, and refusing to
allow claim 19 subsequently amended. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002);
37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013