The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK HERNANDEZ and MUNA AHMED ABU-DALO
____________
Appeal 2007-3548
Application 10/627,947
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 25, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN,
and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1-22, 24, 25 and 28-35.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
1 Claim 26 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter by the
Examiner (Answer 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013